Monday, 1 April 2019

Trade secrets and Non-Disclosure Agreements

Glass of Chartreuse
Author Ospalh 



























Jane Lambert

If you have acquired business or technical information that is either secret or not generally known the unauthorized use or disclosure of which would either harm you or benefit a competitor, you have what is known as a "trade secret".

For many years, the common law (that is to say, law made by judges and not by Parliament) has obliged those who receive trade secrets in confidence ("confidantes") to use such information only for the purpose for which it was imparted and not to make further use of it or disclosure it further.  Such obligation is known as "the obligation of confidence" and the law that imposes it is known as "the law of confidence,"

Since 9 June 2018, the law of confidence has been supplemented by Directive 2016/943 ("the Trade Secrets Directive") which has harmonized trade secrecy law across the European Union.  Art 2 (1) of that Directive defines a trade secret as:
"'......... information which meets all of the following requirements:
(a) it is secret in the sense that it is not, as a body or in the precise configuration and assembly of its components, generally known among or readily accessible to persons within the circles that normally deal with the kind of information in question;
(b) it has commercial value because it is secret;
(c) it has been subject to reasonable steps under the circumstances, by the person lawfully in control of the information, to keep it secret,"
Both the law of confidence and the Directive require those who own or control such information to keep it secret.  Once it enters the public domain otherwise than through an unauthorized disclosure the obligation of confidence and the Directive cease to apply.

Although there are other circumstances in which an obligation of confidence can arise, the usual way is to require the confidante to sign a confidentiality or non-disclosure agreement ("NDA") before you give him or her the information.  NDA can be stand-alone agreements or they can form part of some other agreement such as a contract of employment or a consultancy, distribution, franchise, joint venture, licence, technical transfer or other commercial agreement. Lawyers and patent and trade mark attorneys are often asked to draft general purpose agreements but that is very hard to do and sometimes dangerous as an agreement that is drawn too broadly may not be enforceable.

The best sort of confidentiality agreements specify the information to be disclosed very precisely.  They will state whether the information is to be disclosed in writing, in which case the agreement will identify the document or data file, or orally, in which case it will state the date, time and place of the conversation, the persons present and so on.  The confidante will acknowledge that the information is secret and that he or she will receive it in confidence.  Should there be any possibility that the information may already be known to the confidante there should be a procedure for him or her to say so within a limited time and for some method of expert determination, arbitration or other ADR to resolve disputes.  The reason for, and purpose of, the disclosure should be made clear.  If the confidante can copy a file or document or consult another person his or her permission to do so and any conditions, such as obtaining further confidentiality undertakings, should appear in the agreement.  The confidante must promise to make no further use or disclosure of the information and to hand back any documents, files or copies by a certain date and time.  Finally, the confidante should agree to submit to the courts of Wales and agree that any disputes will be determined in accordance with Welsh and English law.

The agreement must be policed rigorously.  If documents have to be returned by a certain day you should chase them as soon as the deadline arrives.  If third parties are to receive the information in confidence you must make sure that they have signed confidentiality agreements.   If you have any reason to fear that your agreement has been breached you should raise it with the confidante at once. If you are not satisfied with his or her explanation then you must consult solicitors.  If the confidante still does not satisfy you then your solicitors must apply to the court for an order known as an "injunction" requiring the confidante to honour his or her promises with the threat of a fine or imprisonment if he or she disobeys.

All inventions start off life as trade secrets otherwise they will have ceased to be "new" by the time the inventor applies for a patent.   There are, however, many technical advances that remain trade secrets forever.   That may be because the law makes it difficult to patent them such as the source code for computer software which is specifically excluded from the definition of patentable invention as such or because the law of confidence provides better protection than patents for the asset in question.   A good example would be beverages since recipes cannot easily be reverse engineered.  The recipe for Chartreuse, for instance, has been kept secret for hundreds of years because it is known only to two monks at any one time. Many attempts have been made to replicate the liqueur but none has come close.

Should you wish to discuss this article or trade secrecy in general, call me on 020 7404 5252 during office hours or send me a message through my contact form.

Thursday, 28 March 2019

Patent Basics - Should I get a Patent?


Standard YouTube Licence


Jane Lambert

The Intellectual Property Office in Newport has published this video to help people who have invented a new product or process to decide whether they should apply for a patent for their invention,   This video is very helpful but it does not go far enough and two bits of it are confusing.

What is the Advantage of getting a Patent?
In my Patents FAQ I wrote:
"A patent is a monopoly of a new invention. Where the invention is a product it confers the exclusive right to
'prevent third parties not having the owner’s consent from the acts of making, using, offering for sale, selling, or importing for these purposes that product;'
Where the invention is a process it confers the owner gets the exclusive right to
'prevent third parties not having the owner’s consent from the act of using the process, and from the acts of using, offering for sale, selling, or importing for these purposes at least the product obtained directly by that process'."
The video shows a screen with the words
"Will it prevent copying in the markets in which you are interested in."
That is the first bit that is confusing. Patent protection is actually much wider than that. Patents do not just give you the right to stop others from copying your invention.  Patents also give you the right to stop people from making a product or process with the features of your invention even if their product or process was entirely their own work and they were unaware of the existence of your patent or your invention.

That right can be very valuable indeed.

What are the Disadvantages of getting a Patent?
It takes a lot of time and costs a lot of money to get a patent.  You have to persuade an official known as an "examiner" that your invention is new, that it involves an inventive step, that it is capable of industrial application and that it does not fall within a number of exceptions.

You must also "disclose the invention in a manner which is clear enough and complete enough for the invention to be performed by a person skilled in the art" (that is to say, someone with sufficient skill and knowledge of the technology to make or use your invention).  If after the patent has been granted, the IPO or a judge thinks that you failed to do those things. the IPO or Court may well take the patent away from you regardless of your expenditure on developing the invention and obtaining the patent.

Any patent that may be granted by the IPO will be good for the UK alone which means that anybody outside the UK can read your patent on the internet,   Such a person may make or use your invention with impunity. The only way you can prevent that from happening is to apply to the intellectual property office of any other country in which you think that could happen.  As a general rule, you have only one year from your first application in which to make those applications.  The total bill for worldwide patent protection can be massive.

Worse, if your patent is revoked for any reason you lose your right to stop others from making or using your invention for good,

No wonder, many inventors prefer to keep mum about their inventions until they are ready to launch them and then rely on unregistered design right or some other intellectual property right.  On the other hand that has dangers, too.  If a competitor produces an identical product without breaching your confidence, infringing your rights under the Trade Secrets Directive or copying your designs then you can't do anything about it.

How to decide whether or not to patent an Invention?
It is often said that patents are for big companies and are not much use for small businesses.  There is more than a little truth in that because patents cost a lot of money to obtain and even more to enforce.  But it is not entirely true.  Some small businesses such as Claire Mitchell of Chillipeeps has built a successful business around her invention as she explains in this video.


Standard YouTube Licence

You need to consider such things as the market for your invention, the likely sales, the availability of competing products, the invention's shelf life and your available resources.   Unless you are sure your sales or other revenues will more than cover your patenting costs you should think long and hard about the optimum IP protection for your invention.

Intellectual Property Strategists
There is an emerging profession of business advisors called intellectual property strategists who combine their knowledge of intellectual property with their experience of business to advise on the appropriate legal protection for their clients' brands, designs, technology or creative works (see Jackie Hutter What is an IP Strategist (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)).  IP strategists can be barristers and solicitors who specialize in IP or indeed patent or trade mark attorneys but it is important to note that not all members of those professions are IP strategists.

Getting the Right IP Lawyer
The IPO's video advises inventors to seek legal advice which is good but it recommends "IP lawyers" which is the second bit that is confusing.   There are four types of intellectual property lawyer, namely barrister, solicitor, patent agent or attorney and trade mark attorney.  Though there is a lot of overlap each of those professions has its strengths and specialist functions.  My article, IP Services from Barristers 6 April 2013 NPIC News explains the services that barristers specializing in IP such as I can offer.   The IPO's video Attorney talks about applying for a patent  31 July 2014 discusses the work of patent and trade mark attorneys.

Contact
Anyone wishing to discuss this article or patenting or IP strategy generally may call me on 020 7404 5252 during office hours or send me a message through my contact form.

Tuesday, 26 March 2019

Intellectual Property for Startups and other Small Businesses


IP for Start-ups and other Small Businesses from Jane Lambert

Last Friday I was invited by Business Wales to lead a seminar on Intellectual Property for Startups and other Small Businesses at the Beacon Enterprise Centre.  I had a very mixed audience that included an academic operating a social network, a branding consultant, a components' supplier, information technology consultants, a software developer and a solicitor.

As it was a Friday afternoon and my audience was quite a small group I decided not to subject it to a Powerpoint lecture but to ascertain the sort of issues that had arisen in their business, analyse those issues and finally resolve them. It became clear that most of those issues related to branding, trade secrets and confidentiality and copyright.  Nobody was interested in a patent though some were not aware of the fact that they had developed protectable technology

To assist my audience and similar businesses elsewhere, I have uploaded my slides and handouts to Slideshare.   The slides are available above.   The handouts are accessible through the following links:
I also showed the audience this website and its relation to my main website at NIPC Law.

Anyone wishing to discuss this presentation or any of the handouts should call me on 020 7404 5252 or send me a message through my contact page.

Thursday, 14 March 2019

Welcome to NIPC Wales

Jane Lambert














When on holiday in Beaumaris last August I amused my companion by showing her the village in Anglesey with the 58 letter name.  Just to the northwest of that location near the entrance to the A5 dual carriageway, I noticed a building that described itself as the Menai Science Park or M-SParc. I wrote about it in M-SParc, Anglesey's Science Park 28 Aug 2018 NIPC News.

I contacted the science park after I returned from holiday.   They invited me to the Angeleeesy Business Festival which took place on 9 and 10 Oct 2018.  I attended the second day of the festival and wrote about it in Anglesey and the Fourth Industrial Revolution 12 Oct 2018 NIPC News.  While I was there I met Selwyn Owen of Beacon Biorefining and Jayne Jones of Cywain.

Beacon and Cywain held a workshop on sustainable packaging and waste management in Bangor on 29 Jan 2019 which Jayne and Selwyn invited me to address.  Several members of the audience approached me after my talk and asked for advice on issues affecting their businesses.  These were issues that arise frequently at my clinics at Barnsley and Sheffield and I was able to answer them quickly and easily.

At the beginning of this month, I returned to M-SParc to celebrate the park's first anniversary, which happened to coincide with St David's day, with the Pitch Perfect pitching event (see A Good Way to spend St David's Day 2 March 2019 NIPC News). Several of the candidates requested my advice on various IP issues which again I was able to supply quickly and easily.

I received more invitations to speak following those visits.   Yesterday I was in Aberystwyth for another talk on IP and sustainable packaging and waste management (the slides for which are on SlideShare).  On 22 March 2019, I shall deliver a half-day seminar on IP rights at the Beacon Enterprise Centre in Llanelli for Business Wales.

Throughout my career, I have specialized in advising and representing startups and other small businesses on IP, technology, media and competition law.  I set up and chaired for many years the Leeds, Liverpool and Sheffield Inventors Clubs.   I have run pro bono IP clinics in Barnsley, London and other cities for many years.   I wrote Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights which was published by Informa in 2009. 

I communicate with my clients and potential clients in English regions through blogs such as IP  Yorkshire. Now that I am doing more work in Wales I have set up this blog to discuss issues that are likely to be of particular interest to entrepreneurs, innovators and creative businesses in Wales. They will include news of forthcoming talks, clinics, disputes involving Welsh businesses and issues that arise frequently in clinics.

I hope this will be useful,    Should anyone wish to contact me, he or she can call me on 020 7404 5252 during office hours or send me a message through my contact form,