Showing posts with label designs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label designs. Show all posts

Wednesday, 31 August 2022

The IPO's Welsh Language Policy

Author Diomedea Exulnns  Licence CC BY=SA 3.0  Soutce Wikimedia Nant Gwrtheyrn

 











Jane Lambert

Occasionally I am asked why I spend time and money on learning Welsh. After all, so the argument runs, only a few hundred thousand speak it and nearly all of them speak also English. The answer is the same as the reason for learning any language.  A language is the key to a treasure house of ideas and information not all of which are translated or translated well.

Ideas and information are intellectual assets  They take several forms: a line of verse, a catchy song,  an elegant solution to a technical problem or an unforgettable slogan.   They are the product of skill and labour and sometimes genius.   To incentivize their generation the law protects them.  It is that legal protection that we call intellectual property.

Ideas that are generated in Welsh can be protected in Welsh.  The Intellectual Property Office which is headquartered in Newport has operated a Welsh language scheme since 3 Oct 2007.  It was prepared in accordance with the guidelines of the Welsh Language Service pursuant to s.21 (3) of the Welsh Language Act 1993.

Paragraph 1 of that scheme promises "that, in the conduct of public business, it will treat the English and Welsh languages on a basis of equality so far as is both appropriate to the circumstances and reasonably practicable."  The document continues that, where possible, the IPO will explain and offer the IP system in Welsh to those customers wishing to register their IP rights in the United Kingdom through the medium of Welsh.  

Rule 14 (1) of the Patents Rules 2007 which came into effect on 17 Dec 2007, requires the contents of all documents contained in a patent application to be either Welsh or English However, while the English language patent forms are available online, Welsh speaking applicants or their agents must call 01633 814936 or email information@ipo.gov.uk if they require a Welsh version of any of the IPO's forms/booklets.  According to David Pearce, no patent applications in Welsh had been received by the Office by 28 Jan 2008 (see Welsh patent applications: the results are in! 28 Jan 2008 IPKat).

There is no equivalent to rule 14 (1) of the Patents Rules 2007 in The Registered Designs Rules 2006 or The Trade Marks Rules 2008 but para 49 of the scheme offers to accept applications for registered designs and trade marks in Welsh and to make the relevant forms and guidance available in Welsh on the IPO's website.  As far as I can see, applicants or their agents would have to call the above number or send an email to request the relevant form or other document in Welsh.

It would appear from para 34 of the scheme that proceedings before IPO hearing officers can take place in Welsh.  The paragraph states that if the hearing takes place in Wales, it can be conducted in Welsh in the Newport Office where arranged in advance. If, however, no advance notice is given then due to limitations on the number of Welsh speaking staff and the lack of an in-house interpreter, there may be no legally and technically competent Welsh speaker immediately available. The applicant will then be given the choice, without prejudice, of continuing with the hearing in English or adjourning it until a Welsh speaker is available.

The rest of the document deals with such matters as signage, telephone calls, visits from members of the public, seminars and publications. I owe it to the IPO for my first lesson on soft mutations while driving around Newport searching for signs to Concept House when I noticed that "patent" had suddenly morphed into "batent".

I do not know whether any of the Appointed Persons speak Welsh but the Business and Property Courts in Wales ought to be able to hear appeals from Welsh speaking hearing officers in Welsh as well as infringement, invalidity, revocation and threats actions in all areas of IP law except patents, registered designs, chip topographies and plant varieties. The Court of Appeal and Supreme Court have been known to sit in Cardiff and there is at least one Welsh speaking Supreme Court justice.

My Welsh is not yet good enough to present a case in Welsh, but once it is ............ Anyone wishing to discuss this article may call me on +44 (0)7404 5252 during office hours or send me a message through my contact page.

Thursday, 2 July 2020

Understanding Intellectual Property


Standard YouTube Licence

Jane Lambert

On Tuesday 30 June 2020 I gave a talk over Zoom for the Menai Science Park Enterprise Hub entitled Understanding Intellectual Property.  I spoke for just over 30 minutes and then answered questions from the audience. I made 42 slides which Emily Roberts distributed to attendees after my talk.  I have also uploaded them to Slideshare. As there is a limit to what a person who did not attend the talk can learn from a set of slides, I have summarized my talk in this article.

Intellectual property is the collective term for the bundle of laws that protect investment in branding, design, technology and creativity.  Examples of those laws include patents for inventions and copyright for architecture, drawings, films, novels, plays and sound recordings.  They reflect a bargain that the public makes with those engaged in creating and disseminating new products and services.  In exchange for sharing their creativity and innovation with the public, the public grants them monopolies or exclusive rights that offer them opportunities to recoup their investment and perhaps a little bit more.

Those monopolies and exclusive rights can be very valuable,  As the Intellectual Property Office explains in its animation IP BASICS: Is Intellectual Property important to my business?. they can be used to exploit a competitve advantage.  They can also make money even when their owner is not making or selling anything because they may be licensed for periodic payments known as "royalties" or assigned for one-off payments.

On the other hand, as the animation also explains, intellectual property can be an existential threat to a business.  That is because the remedies and penalties for intellectual property infringement are draconian.  Another reason to take account of intellectual property.

There are often different ways of protecting an intellectual asset.  For instance, the inventor of a new product may tell the world how to make or use his or her invention in return for a patent.  Alternatively, he or she may keep it under wraps and require his or her employees to keep it secret. Not a bad option for a product that cannot easily be reverse-engineered such as a beverage.  That is how Coca Cola has kept its recipe secret since the end of the 19th century and the monks of Chartreuse the recipe for their liqueur for centuries,  But a drug company with a new medicine in competition with other major pharmaceutical companies around the world will probably want a patent in each of its main markets.

Some intellectual property rights such as copyrights, design rights, rights in performances and actions for breach of confidence and passing off come into being automatically and cost nothing to obtain. Others such as patents, trade marks or registered designs have to be registered with the Intellectual Property Office in Newport or a foreign intellectual property office for protection overseas.

When applying for a patent it is a good idea to instruct a patent attorney. They can make the necessary searches and draft the application in such a way as to maximize protection but minimize the risk of a challenge to the patent's validity.  The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys has produced a very good video entitled Why do I need a Patent Attorney? which shows how patent attorneys work.  Many patent attorneys are also trade mark attorneys or work in partnership with trade mark attorneys.  If a business owner wants to register a trade mark or design he or she would be well advised to consider a trade mark attorney, The Chartered Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys publishes a useful video on trade mark attorneys entitled How to navigate Intellectual Property Law.

I am often asked how much it costs to register a patent, trade mark or registered design.  The answer depends on how much work the attorney has to do.  There are also office fees and sometimes other costs such as translations or disbursements for other professionals such as barristers.   Typically, a patent for the UK can cost anything up to £5,000 or even more if there are objections and hearings.  Research published by the European Patent Office some years ago calculated that a 10 page patent with drawings for France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK renewed for up to 10 years could cost €30,000.  A patent covering all those countries plus China, India, Japan, South Korea and the USA could easily amount to £100,000.  Trade marks and registered designs are a lot cheaper.  Well under £1,000 for a UK trade mark including searches, drafting a specification and correspondence with the examiner or third parties and even less for a design registration as there is no substantive examination.

Although some IP infringements are criminal offences, primary responsibility for enforcing IP rights lies with the IP owner.   In Wales and England actions for IP infringement have to be brought in the Intellectual Property List of the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales.   Claims for damages for patent or registered design infringement exceeding £500,000 are brought in the Patents Court which sits in the Rolls Building in London. Claims for infringements of other IP rights have to be brought in the Chancery Division of the High Court or a County Court hearing centre where there is also a Chancery district registry.  The costs of litigating in Patents Court or the Chancery Division can be massive.  Assessments of over £1 million are not uncommon.  Claims under £500,000 can be brought in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court where recoverable costs are limited to £50,000.  There is a small claims track for claims under £10,000 where the recoverable costs are limited to a few hundred pounds.  The Intellectual Property Office offers a cost-effective mediation service and examiners' opinions on patent validity and infringement disputes.   Both the World Intellectual Property Organization and Nominet provide a cost-effective service for resolving domain name disputes.

Intellectual property claims are often excluded from legal liability insurance policies but there are a few brokers who specialize in IP insurance.   Ian Wishart of Sybaris Special Risks gave a talk on the cover that are available for start-ups and SMEs when he visited M-SParc last September. Other sources of funding are members of the Association of Litigation Funders.  In the USA and some other countries, it is possible to instruct lawyers on the understanding that they will be paid only if their client wins and that their fee will be a share of any damages that may be awarded.

The following websites provide further information on intellectual property the last two of which are my own:


Name
URL
Intellectual Property Office
European Patent Office
https://www.epo.org/
European Union
Intellectual Property Office
World Intellectual
Property Organization
British Library Business and
Intellectual Property Centre
NIPC
NIPC Wales

There is a network of Business and Intellectual Property Centres based which offer a wide range of services and resources onsite and online. The largest of those centres is at the British Library in London. The British Library Business & IP Centre video provides a good introduction to the Centre's services.  Anyone can join its Linkedin and Facebook groups and subscribe to its mailing lists but it is necessary to obtain a British Library reader's ticket to use its onsite services. The nearest Business and IP Centre to Anglesey is Liverpool Central Library and its services are described in the Business and IP Centre Liverpool video.

I finished by mentioning that the Menai Science Park is gathering the following network of professional advisors who can advise and assist its tenants and other businesses and creative or innovative individuals in Northwest Wales:


Profession
Name
Barrister
Commercial Solicitor
Innovation Consultant
IP Tax Specialist
IP Specialist Solicitor 
Patent Attorney


The first question I was asked after my talk was how to protect computer programs.  I replied that copyright was the main way of preventing copying of the code itself and perhaps also features of a program such as its system, sequence and organization. Secret information relating to the design and development of the program such as comments in the source code might be protected from unauthorized use or disclosure by the law of confidence or under the Trade Secrets Directive.  Although computer programs are not patentable as such it is sometimes possible to obtain a patent for a software-implemented invention.

The next question was on how to protect a new travel service.  I explained that services were the most difficult type of innovation to protect. A service provider could register his or her brand as a trade mark and copyright prevented copying of manuals, advertisements and other literature.  Business information such as customers' names and addresses might be protected by the law of confidence and the Trade Secrets Directive.  However, the basic idea of the service could not be monopolized.  Anyone could offer a competing service so long as they did not lead the public to believe that their services were the same as the original service provider's.

My third question was whether copyright prevented copying of products.   I replied that copyright was once an indirect way of protecting new product designs but that had been abolished by the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988.  Original designs - that is to say the shape and configuration of articles - are now protected by a new IP right called unregistered design right.  The term of protection was much shorter: 15 years if nothing is made to the design or 10 years from the date of first marketing if articles were made to the design.   In the last 5 years, anyone including an infringer could apply as of right for a licence to make the item.  

The last question was on what to do if an infringer reposts a photo on his website without permission.   I said that most actions in the Small Claims Track were claims of that kind (see Jane Lambert Damages Awards in the Small Claims Track 17 June 2020 NIPC Law).  The court could grant injunctions and award up to £10,000 in damages. It was not always necessary to instruct a lawyer for a small claim and the costs that could be awarded against an unsuccessful party were limited to issue fees, loss of earnings and travel expenses.  Hearings of the Small Claims Track now took place in Business and Property Courts hearing centres outside London such as Liverpool and Cardiff.

Anyone wishing to discuss this topic should call my clerk Stephen Somerville on +44(0)7986 948267 or send me a message through my contact page.

Thursday, 28 November 2019

Patent, Design and Trade Mark Filings in Wales

GB189420431 (A)





















Jane Lambert

Wales can claim to have invented one of the world's first flying machines years before the Wright Brothers.  Wiliam Frost of Saundersfoot filed an application for a patent for the following invention on 25 Oct 1894:
"The flying machine is propelled into the air by two reversible fans revolving horizontally. When sufficient height is gained, wings are spread and tilted by, means of a lever, causing the machine to float onward and downward. When low enough the lever is reversed causing it to rise upward & onward. When required to stop it the wings are tilted so as to hold against the wind or air and lowered by the reversible fans. The steering is done by a helm. fitted to front of machine."
Nowadays, aerospace is an important sector of the Welsh economy - one of several that are developing impressive new products and processes that require legal protection.

According to the Intellectual Property Office's Facts and Figures 2018, some 351 patent applications were filed from Wales in 2018 which was 2.7% of the UK total placing Wales 10th in the UK's nations and regions behind London with 2,625, Southeast England (1,944), Eastern England (1,811), Southwest England (1,312), the West Midlands (977), Northwest England (956), Scotland (756), Yorkshire and the Humber (693) and the East Midlands (486). However, Wales was ahead of Northeast England (279) and Northern Ireland (143).  That was 8% fewer than the number of applications made the previous year which was more than the UK trend that was down from 13,286 to 12,843. On the other hand, Wales bucked the trend in the number of grants which was 114 in 2018 - up from 109 in 2017.  The number of grants for the UK was 3,001 in 2018 down from 3,260 the year before.

There was an increase in the number of trade mark registration applications from Wales (1,809 in 2018 up from 1,700 in 2017) which was in line with the UK as a whole (66,875 in 2018 and 63,097 in 2017).  As in patents, Wales trailed all other nations and regions except Northeast England and Northern Ireland in trade mark applications.  There was also an increase in the number of grants to applicants in Wales (from 2,274 in 2017 to 3,159 in 2018) in line the rest of the UK (113,334 in 2017 to 122,165 in 2018).

Wales was ahead of the East Midlands, Northeast England, Northern Ireland and Scotland in the number of design registration applications in 2018 (1,965 in 2018 compared to 634 in 2017). That was also roughly in line with the UK as a whole which made 14,797 applications in 2017 and 20,984 in 2018.  There was also a similar increase in the number of grants up from 541 in 2017 to 939 in 2018.

Tomorrow I shall be speaking to Welsh entrepreneurs, inventors and creatives at the Menai Science Park (M-SParc) about patent, trade mark and design searches and how to read patents between 13:30 and 14:30.  We have had such a brig response that we have had to move the meeting from the boardroom to the training room but I am sure we could still take in a few more.  This link will take you to the Eventbrite page where you can register for the talk.

Anyone wishing to discuss this article or IP generally may call me on 020 7404 5252 during normal office hours or send me a message through my contact page.

Wednesday, 24 April 2019

Choosing the Right IP Protection

Author Ron Maijen
Licence Creative Commons Attribution0Share Alike 2.0 Generic
Source Wikipedia Playing Card





















Jane Lambert

There is usually more than one way to protect an intellectual asset.  A brand, for instance, may be protected by trade mark registration or by the law of passing off. A business owner's choice will depend on many factors such as the business's resources, the value of the intellectual asset, the vulnerability of the IP right to cancellation and so on.

Trade Mark Registration
A trade mark can be registered for the United Kingdom alone or for the whole of the European Union including the United Kingdom for so long as the UK remains a member of the EU.  It is also possible to register a mark in some or all of the countries that are party to the Madrid Protocol by applying for an international registration. 

In each case, there are three sets of costs to take into account.  The first is for searches to ascertain whether there are any early registrations that might conflict with the application. Secondly, there are the fees charged by each office for processing the application.  These start at £200 for an application to the Trade Marks Registry of the Intellectual Property Office ("the IPO") for the registration of a mark for one class of goods in the UK.  Thirdly, there may be attorneys' fees for conducting the search, drafting the application and dealing with objections from examiners or third parties in the IPO or indeed the registries of any of the other countries in which registration is sought.  Sometimes a hearing may be necessary for which counsel must be briefed.  The cost of a trade mark application may, therefore, range from a few hundred pounds for a single country where there is no objection to many thousands of pounds for a contested application.

A registration may be challenged even after it has been granted on the grounds that the mark should never have been registered or that it should be revoked because it has not been used or it has ceased to be distinctive.  The challenge may be brought in the registry or by way of counterclaim in infringement proceedings.

Although some trade mark infringements are criminal offences in the UK, it is primarily the registered proprietor's responsibility to enforce his or her rights.  The small claims track of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court ("IPEC") can hear claims for damages of £10,000 or less that can be tried in no more than a day.  In the small claims track the costs that can be recovered from an unsuccessful party are limited to a few hundred pounds.   Claims up to £500,000 that can be tried within 2 days can be brought in IPEC's multitrack. The costs that may be recovered from an unsuccessful party in IPEC are capped at £50,000. Any other claim has to be brought in the Chancery Division of the High Court where cases and costs are managed but the amount that can be recovered from the unsuccessful party is unlimited.

Passing off
The right to bring an action for passing off arises automatically so there are no application costs.  On the other hand, is usually more difficult and hence more expensive to bring such an action than it is to sue for trade mark infringement.  The claimant has to prove that he or she has goodwill by reference to a trade mark, trade name, logo, get-up or other indicia which usually requires voluminous evidence of sales and advertising. Secondly, he or she has to prove that the defendant has misrepresented a connection with his or her goods, services or business by, for example, using the same or similar name, mark, logo or get-up. Thirdly, the claimant has to prove loss or damage such as loss of sales or reputation.

Actions for passing off can be brought in the small claims track or multitrack of IPEC or the High Court with the same costs consequences as for trade mark litigation.  Actions for passing off are often brought with trade mark infringement claims.

Since it has become possible to register marks for services, there are very few businesses that decide deliberately to rely solely on the law of passing off. Quite apart from the ease with which a trade mark action can be brought, a trade mark is a right that can be assigned, charged or licensed for money or moneysworth which is not the case with an action for passing off.

Designs
A new design with individual character can be registered for up to 25 years for the UK alone as a registered design or for the whole of the EU including the UK as a registered Community design ("RCD").  Any design that can be registered as a registered design or as an RCD enjoys automatic protection against copying throughout the EU including the UK for 3 years as an unregistered Community design ("UCD").  As the UK is now party to the Hague Agreement concerning the International Registration of International it is possible to apply for the registration of the design in the contracting countries from a single filing.

Original designs of the shape or configuration (whether internal or external) of the whole or part of an article made by UK nationals or nationals of certain other countries are protected automatically against copying for up to 15 years in the UK by unregistered design right.

Artwork for surface decoration can be protected automatically against copying for the life of the author plus 70 years by copyright in the UK and other countries. Certain other designs can be protected by copyright for the same term as works of artistic craftsmanship.

The process of registering a design or RCD is simpler than the process of registering a trade mark because there is no substantive examination.  Accordingly, the process is quicker and cheaper. The IPO charges £50 to register a single design as a registered design and the European Union Intellectual Property Office ("EUIPO") €230 to register an RCD. However, design registrations can be challenged after grant by cancellation proceedings in the IPO or the EUIPO or by way of counterclaim in infringement proceedings.

Design registration is appropriate for high-value items that are likely to be on the market for a long time such as jewellery or electrical appliances.  For toys, fashion items and other items that are likely to go out of style quickly the terms provided by UCD and unregistered design right may be quite long enough.

Actions for the infringement of registered designs or RCD must be brought in the Patents Court or IPEC multitrack regardless of value.  They cannot be brought in the IPEC small claims track.  Claims for the infringement of UCD, unregistered design right or copyright may be brought in the IPEC small claims track or multitrack or the Chancery Division.

Technology
Those who have created a new product or process can choose to disclose it to the world in return for a patent or to keep it under wraps in the hope that nobody will work out how to make or use it.  In the case of CocaCola and Chartreuse, keeping stumm can be a very effective strategy as I noted in Trade Secrets and Non-Disclosure Agreements 1 April 2019.

Patents are the most difficult and expensive IP right to acquire but they can also be the most valuable.  They prohibit not just the copying of an invention but also making, importing, distributing, keeping or using it.  A person who makes or uses an infringing item can be liable even if he made or used the product or process quite honestly without referring to the patented product or knowing the existence of the patent.

Patents can be granted for the UK alone by the IPO or for the UK and up to over 40 other countries by the European Patent Office ("EPO"). Patents can also be granted pursuant to a single application in all the countries that are party to the Patent Cooperation Treaty ("PCT"). An application for a patent for the UK alone rarely costs less than £5,000 (see Dehns The Cost of a Patent).  According to Roland Berger, the cost of obtaining and maintaining a typical European patent in up to 6 countries from 10 years cost over €30,000 (see Roland Berger Market Research Study on the Cost of Patenting).  Registering the patent in the USA, China, Japan, South Korea, Brazil, Russia, India and other industrial countries can easily exceed £100,000.  In addition to searches and office fees, applicants have to pay for renewal fees which increase over the years in some countries. 

Attorneys' fees are also more expensive than for design and trade mark applications since the specification has to be sufficiently clear and complete to enable a person with the appropriate skill and knowledge to make or use the invention after the patent expires. The monopoly claimed must be broad enough for the owner of the patent to have the widest possible protection but it must not be so wide as to be invalid.

Patents granted by the EPO can be challenged immediately after grant in proceedings called "opposition". In the UK and other countries, patents can be challenged in the office that granted them in revocation proceedings or by way of counterclaim in infringement proceedings.  Such proceedings tend to be expensive.  According to TaylorWessing's Patent Map, patent infringement proceedings can cost between £200,000 and £1 million in London.  Claims have to be brought in the Patents Court or IPEC multitrack. They cannot be brought in the small claims track.

Businesses can rely on the law of confidence and the new Trade Secrets Directive to prevent unauthorized access to, use or disclosure of undisclosed technical information for so long as it remains outside the public domain. Trade secrecy has proved to be an effective way to protect the source code of computer programs over the years.  That protection is lost once the information enters the public domain which can result from reverse engineering or parallel research and development.

Software is also protected from reproduction by literary copyright for the life of the author plus 70 years. Data can be protected from unauthorized extraction and re-utilization by database rights. A modified form of unregistered design right can protect semiconductor topographies from unlicensed reproduction for up to 25 years.

Creativity
Works of art and literature including broadcasts, films and sound recordings as well as original artistic, dramatic, literary and musical works are protected automatically from copying, publishing, renting and lending, performance, communication to the public and adaptation for the life of the author plus 70 years. Her Majesty's Government is party to the Berne Convention which extends such protection to most countries of the world.  Actors, dancers, musicians, singers and other performers automatically have the right to object to the unauthorized broadcasting, filming or taping of their performances and the distribution of copies of those performances by virtue of Part II of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Those rights are known as rights in performancesBroadcasters, film and sound recording studios which have contracted to record such performances also have the right to object to unauthorized broadcasting, filming or taping. Although piracy (copyright infringement on an industrial scale) and bootlegging (infringement of rights in performances on an industrial scale) are criminal offences, primary responsibility for enforcing copyrights and rights in performances rests with the rights holders. They can bring claims up to £10,000 in the small claims track of IPEC, £500,000 in the IPEC multitrack and all other claims in the Chancery Division.

Conclusion
This is the toolkit that is available to rights holders. I shall discuss how to select those tools at my talk on What is IP? et cetera at M-SParc (the Menai Science Park) on Friday, 26 April 2019 at 13:00 (see Anglesey to celebrate World IP Day 10 April 2019 and Maximizing your Intellectual Assets  23 April 2019).  If you want to attend you can register here.  If you can't make that seminar but would like my slides or handout or wish to discuss any other IP matter, please call me on 020 7404 5252 during office hours or send me a message through my contact form.

Tuesday, 26 March 2019

Intellectual Property for Startups and other Small Businesses


IP for Start-ups and other Small Businesses from Jane Lambert

Last Friday I was invited by Business Wales to lead a seminar on Intellectual Property for Startups and other Small Businesses at the Beacon Enterprise Centre.  I had a very mixed audience that included an academic operating a social network, a branding consultant, a components' supplier, information technology consultants, a software developer and a solicitor.

As it was a Friday afternoon and my audience was quite a small group I decided not to subject it to a Powerpoint lecture but to ascertain the sort of issues that had arisen in their business, analyse those issues and finally resolve them. It became clear that most of those issues related to branding, trade secrets and confidentiality and copyright.  Nobody was interested in a patent though some were not aware of the fact that they had developed protectable technology

To assist my audience and similar businesses elsewhere, I have uploaded my slides and handouts to Slideshare.   The slides are available above.   The handouts are accessible through the following links:
I also showed the audience this website and its relation to my main website at NIPC Law.

Anyone wishing to discuss this presentation or any of the handouts should call me on 020 7404 5252 or send me a message through my contact page.